POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW

Keywords: Peer review, Periodicals as topic, Publishing, Retraction of publication as topic, Scholarly communication

Abstract

POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Coskun Benlidayi I. Quality peer review is essential for scholarly publishing. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics 2022:3(1):79-81.

Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. Account Res 2015;22(1):22-40.

Martínez-Saucedo M, Téllez-Camacho S, Aquino-Jarquín G, Sánchez-Urbina R, Granados-Riverón JT. Post-publication peer review: another sort of quality control of the scientific record in biomedicine. Gac Med Mex 2020;156(6):523-526.

Haunschild R, Bornmann L. Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers. Scientometrics 2021;126(6):5181-5199.

Published
2023-05-13